An autism breakthrough?!! When scientific insights come up in private readings
A reading describes a breakthrough in the treatment of autism
When scientific insights come up in private readings
You may know me from my public readings related to the Trump era, but in private readings, I have come across interesting insights into medical issues and scientific research. To be clear, biology, medicine and biotech has NEVER been an interest of mine. But when it shows up in readings, it comes with startling clarity.
I can see specific areas of organs, organ tissue in close-up detail, like an advanced microscope, and I can also see how the person experiences this condition. How they see the world and what pains them.
One very recent reading I did was so interesting that I was psyched for several days afterwards, connecting dots.
A reading describes a breakthrough in the treatment of autism
The reading. Mark* booked a reading and said he had been watching my videos on YouTube for a while. He told me he was calling about his son who is 12 years old and suffers from autism. His son doesn’t speak or respond very clearly to parental attention. It was hard enough to communicate, let alone understand what he might be thinking, feeling, and what drives his behavior.
Fast forward to outcome. Right away, I saw an image of a young man in his early 20s in what looked like a university town, and what appeared to be graduate school. He had a girlfriend who was also in graduate school. They were talking to each other. Meaning, if he is 12 years old now, graduate school would happen about 10 years down the line. Basically, he will be speaking within the time frame of 10 years.
Walking backwards to now: seeing how the child perceives the world. Seeing the outcome means little until I can trace back to where the child is, today. Just the weekend prior to the reading, he kissed his dad’s forehead for the first time. This was a major milestone. What makes these simple interactions so challenging to the child?
Stepping back into the “today” mode, I saw how his son perceives the world, as if I was seeing everything with his eyes. I saw him looking out onto a house and a garden. Then the image he saw became pixelated. It transformed into a card with a grid of colors, meaning , when this scene enters his brain, it is read in binary terms, like data is. So everything that he experiences goes into his brain like a series of numerical patterns.
Processing life experience as a series of patterns. While we understand life and the world as a largely sensory experience, this autistic child understands the world as a series of patterns. Patterns that must be constantly processed. So when he is engaging with you he is constantly processing information. Sensory experience can be physically painful for him, because his brain enters into a “processing” mode that is painful and taxing. So he can’t process information ( an input function ) and express emotion or share information ( an output function ) at the same time.
Facial expressions are hard to parse. I saw the child seeing his father’s face and it was as if each specific micro-expression were read as a separate pattern. It did not feel clear to him at all. It was as if he was not able to tell that facial expressions were continuous. From his perspective, each micro-expression was recorded separately. The lack of binary clarity was physically taxing to him.
Active and Inactive areas of the brain. All of this processing of sensory information was happening in only one area, which looked like upper frontal part of the brain.
After I seeing the over-active area, I was presented the inactive area of the brain. It saw what I can describe as a close up of brain matter. It looked white ( as opposed to the its natural gray color ) to signify it has no activity. There is nothing happening there. The inactive area was located on the back of his head.
What the autism treatment looked like
Tiny battery-like devices. The next frame showed me the back of a teenager’s head with hair and everything, and these tiny dots that look like batteries, placed a in circular pattern, measuring something like 3mm each. A cluster of three. At First, they were inside the head, but not very deep, as if they were underneath the scalp, like some sort of scalp implant. Then I saw them now located externally, on top of his scalp, almost as if they had been glued there or something. They were hidden by his hair and could be worn unnoticed.
How these battery-like devices work. These tiny batteries were placed right above the brain section I first saw as being inactive. The batteries were placed there as if to “grow” these inactive areas. Analogous to how artificial lights can make indoor plants grow.
I saw that that once these inactive areas of the brain were stimulated with these low-grade electrical emissions through the batteries, 24/7, the inactive brain areas would grow, and once they grow, they would remove the processing weight from the over-active part of the autistic child’s brain.
Stimulating inactive areas of the brain. What they showed me reminded me of how when a person breaks a leg, the healthy leg will grow a lot to compensate for the other leg that is not working. Once the broken leg is healed, there is less burden on the other leg and it doesn’t have to grow to compensate the non-functioning leg. This is why it’s important to stimulate the areas of the brain that are inactive. Because only when inactive areas regain activity, can the over-stimulated, over-active brain areas lessen their work load.
Does it actually exist?!! So after I had explained all of that to him over the phone, I looked up “brain implant autism”. To my surprise, something similar existed, currently being used mostly for Parkinson’s disease. I sent him the link and said good bye, on the following day, decided to look into it further.
Is the big autism breakthrough already here?
“Can brain-stimulating implants treat some severe cases of autism?”
The next day I kept searching and found an article on Science magazine titled “Can brain-stimulating implants treat some severe cases of autism?“
As I started reading the article, I felt that the neuroscientist the article gave most of the space to, was not completely “correct” on his approach. He used electro-magnetic tools to cut down the over-stimulation in the over-active areas of the autistic brain. In contrast, the images I had seen pointed to using electro-magnetic stimulation on the under-active areas.
At the bottom of the Science article linked, I found reference to the “right person”. He is a professor at MIT. His name is Ed Boyden.
I clicked on the reference listed on the Science Magazine article and saw this illustration.
Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation Via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields
This is exactly what I had seen (stimulation onto specific areas of the brain, continuously, 24/7, via some sort of long-term or permanent insert).
I was so sure of what I had seen, and I was so convinced that it is the correct path, that I sent him a detailed message. On Twitter timeline I found the mention that his team’s patent had been granted [ see illustrations from the patent application below ] And as I looked at the patent application, I saw the same battery-like dots and the triangular cluster pattern. THAT’S IT!!!
It takes a while to go through the FDA but this is excellent news!!!
